Reaper-class Carrier launched!!!

Crossman · Post by **Crossman** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:57 pm

The United Imperium of Crossman has launched it's first of the Reaper-class carriers, the ICS Reaper.

Class: Reaper
Type: Carrier
Designer: Port Crossman Fleetyards, Crossmantica
Crew: 1,000 (plus 1,500 air crew)
Propulsion:
1 warp core, 2 warp nacelles
1 MkV subatomic impulse engine
Speed:
Normal Cruising: Warp 7.5
Maximum Cruising: Warp 9
Maximum Rated: Warp 9.5 for 36hours
Defense Systems:
Auto modulated sheild system
Heavy Tritanium double hull
10cm Ablative armor
High level structural integrity field
Armament:
20 Type XII Heavy Phaser arrays
6 Quantum torpedo tubes
5 Type X Heavy Pulse Phasers
Length: 1,200 meters
Shuttles/Fighters:
50 shuttles
600 fighters
200 bombers
Troops: 100 Marines

Crossman · Post by **Crossman** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:58 pm

(And that would be the finalised picture...... with background!)

Mekanta · Post by **Mekanta** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:59 pm

It looked good until I saw the Trek equipment.

But hey, it's not a saucerhead, so it's not as bad as it could be.

Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:10 am

Intresting. I notice the paper thin armor, but given the unit's role, the armor shouldn't be *too* much of a problem. I'd be really careful around any nation with half-way decent weapons though. Hell, one of my infantry weapons could pierce that armor with little trouble.

Jangle Jangle Ridge · Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:12 am

I believe the actual armor is the double hull part.

CorpSac · Post by **CorpSac** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:22 am

wow keep that thing away from some of my weakest Capital ship weapons if that thing lost its shields lol.

Jangle Jangle Ridge · Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:25 am

Just shoot a few railgun shells or something. Fission cannon, whatever.

Crossman · Post by **Crossman** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:59 am

Mekanta wrote:It looked good until I saw the Trek equipment.

But hey, it's not a saucerhead, so it's not as bad as it could be.

I'm still working out my own tech.

Crossman · Post by **Crossman** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:00 am

Jangle Jangle Ridge wrote:I believe the actual armor is the double hull part.

Thank you JJR, for actually paying attention.

Jangle Jangle Ridge · Post by **Jangle Jangle Ridge** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 1:05 am

Crossman wrote:
Jangle Jangle Ridge wrote:I believe the actual armor is the double hull part.
Thank you JJR, for actually paying attention.

One question, how thick is this double hull?