Page 52 of 72

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:07 am
by Solar Communes
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=17003

I think this is the portrait of the average NSer.

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 2:33 am
by Arizona Nova
Solar Communes wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=17003

I think this is the portrait of the average NSer.
The requested topic does not exist?

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Fri Sep 18, 2009 3:47 am
by Solar Communes
Arizona Nova wrote:
Solar Communes wrote:http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=17003

I think this is the portrait of the average NSer.
The requested topic does not exist?
FASCISTS!

It was a thread with a n00b asking people "How do I write a breakup letter to my GF?"

*Edit:

Couldn't resist:

http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic ... &start=100
If "all animals have hierarchies", then we should go back to the jungle, eat bananas and rape females just like some animals do, because it's instinct, right?[...]as long as the usual retarded guy watching Oprah laughs over the same joke for the nth time while drinking a beer like Homer Simpson, nothing good shall ever come, and the few smarter people shall run the show and laugh at those who fund them with their sweat.

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:00 am
by Arizona Nova
Everything that is wrong about MT in one thread; truly amazing
  • Puppet wanking (because I'm sure three completely seperate people decided to join as variations on Valik, on the same day)
  • Godmodding (against one's puppets but the point stands)
  • One-line/paragraph posts describing enormous mobilizations and momentous actions
  • Stupid motherfuckers playing along to the masturbation
Christ SC, thank God, Anonymous, whoever you got out of there.

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:31 am
by Solar Communes
You forgot posting 30 lines about the features of your latest missile/tank/airplane/etc that is "the most advanced Modern Technology could afford and anything better would be PMT" in an IC thread.

Or of the people who scavenge random white papers in the Internet to justify their tech-wank on the hopes everybody is too ignorant to realize they aren't truly following all the facts on those white papers and casually ignoring the mentions that "it is a supposition and future military R&D may prove it won't work".

And not to add the people who just post stuff in NSDraftroom aware it lacks a 100% wank-proof reviewing of fictional designs, and thus they can spout "but it's NSD approved!" whenever someone questions how absurd their designs are.

I'm probably the only one who gives names or at least speeches to the fictional tank crews of the fictional tanks instead of masturbating to the tanks.

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 7:42 pm
by Neo-Mekanta
Solar Communes wrote:I'm probably the only one who gives names or at least speeches to the fictional tank crews of the fictional tanks instead of masturbating to the tanks.
... Does it count if you have depictions of tentacle rape on said tanks?

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:43 am
by Solar Communes
Neo-Mekanta wrote:
Solar Communes wrote:... Does it count if you have depictions of tentacle rape on said tanks?
Links or it didn't happen.

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2009 9:47 am
by Arizona Nova

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:22 pm
by Solar Communes
http://forum.nationstates.net/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=18406

Someone is using NS for FAIL veiled softcore cybersex, the sky is blue and I'm tempted to open a Russian Bride Service Storefront. And then make a fusion between EFG Industries(Mary Sue Storefront) and Medvedved Enterprises.

Re: LOL NS.

Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2009 8:11 am
by Kostemetsia
See, if it was WIN veiled softcore cybersex, I could totally roll with that.

But it's not, so I can't. :(