o.OSolar Communes wrote: I wrote it from a somewhat In-character perspective with some serious superlatives. Just like there are several hints the article isn't entirely serious and objecitve in how it describes this character. Just like the Star Wars Kid and the owner of the Longcat can't manipulate millions into their bidding, she obviously can't.
Serious business.OOC Warning: These facts are High Canon[...]
You... wrote something tantamount to IC propiganda, attached an ooc note saying these facts were canon, and act suprised when someone takes you at face value?
I see what you were trying to do, but you were far to subtle for the medium and context in which you were working.
She might not be, but you can't say she hasn't led the opposite of a normal life.Solar Communes wrote: *edit: Also, couldn't Britney Spears manipulate millions of personality-less fangirls into buying something? You can't really believe she is above average, can you?
Anyway, from what you've said here it sounds like the character is more ballanced, but given what's in the article when you declared her awesome incarnate?
"Mary Sue" is the polite analysis. Again, based on the information avalible at the time.